Volume 70 | Issue 10 | Year 2024 | Article Id. IJMTT-V70I10P105 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V70I10P105
Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
---|---|---|---|
12 Aug 2024 | 21 Sep 2024 | 12 Oct 2024 | 30 Nov 2024 |
In this paper, an attempt was made to analyze the semester examination results for different mathematics courses offered by the Engineering Department using Six Sigma levels. Arbitrary weights are assigned depending on the importance of the courses in the level, and weighted Six Sigma levels are obtained.
Defectives per million, Weighted defectives per million, Sigma levels, Examination results.
[1] Fred R. McFadden, “Six –Sigma Quantity Program,” Quality Progress, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 37-42, 1993.
[2] Mikel J. Harry, “Six Sigma: A Breakthrough Strategy for Profitability,” Quality Progress, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 60-64, 1998.
[Google Scholar]
[3] James. M. Lucas, “The Essential Six Sigma,” Quality Progress, pp. 27-31, 2002.
[Google Scholar]
[4] Gwen Fontenot, Ravi Behara, and Alicia Gresham, “Six Sigma in Customer Satisfaction,” Quality Progress, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 73-76,
1994.
[Google Scholar]
[5] J. Ravichandran, “Six Sigma Milestone: An Overall Sigma Level of an Organization,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence,
vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 973-980, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] J. Ravichandran, “Performance of an Education Institution Using Sigma Levels of Exam Results,” Proceedings of National conference
on Quality Improvement Concepts and their Implementation in Higher Educational Institutions, pp. 78-86, 2009.
V. Ganesh, M. Chandrasekaran, V. Sharada, S. Lavanya, "A Study on Examination Results Using Six Sigma Process," International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 30-34, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V70I10P105