Volume 71 | Issue 10 | Year 2025 | Article Id. IJMTT-V71I10P112 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V71I10P112
Fuzzy Database and Fuzzy Logic Approach for Soil Health Testing Using Triangular Fuzzy Number
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2025 | 30 Sep 2025 | 19 Oct 2025 | 30 Oct 2025 |
Ashok Sahebrao Mhaske, "Fuzzy Database and Fuzzy Logic Approach for Soil Health Testing Using Triangular Fuzzy Number," International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 79-86, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V71I10P112
Soil health plays an important role in agricultural productivity and sustainability. However, traditional soil testing reports generated from a soil testing lab gives a crisp numerical value for parameters such as PH, Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Organic Carbon, Potassium, etc. In real-life applications, these parameters are uncertain or in range due to measurement and environmental variations. This article presents a fuzzy logic-based framework for soil testing methods to predict the soil health condition in linguistic terms such as excellent, good, moderate, and poor, using triangular fuzzy numbers. The ten soil parameters were considered pH, Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Organic Carbon (OC), Electrical Conductivity (EC), Zinc (Zn), Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), and Manganese (Mn). Each parameter is represented into a fuzzy triangular number. A Python program is used to mapped the membership function values into four soil health categories.
Fuzzy logic, Soil Health, Triangular Fuzzy Number, Python, Membership Function, Linguistic Parameters.
[1] Praveen
Sankarasubramanian, and E.N. Ganesh, “IoT Based Prediction for Industrial
Ecosystem,” International Journal of
Engineering and Advanced Technology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1544-1548, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Ammar
Adham et al., “Identification of Suitable Sites for Rainwater Harvesting
Structures in Arid And Semi-Arid Regions: A Review,” International Soil and Water Conservation Research, vol. 4, pp. 108-120,
2016
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Khalil
Misbah et al., “Multi-Sensors Remote Sensing Applications for Assessing,
Monitoring, and Mapping NPK Content in Soil and Crops in African Agricultural
Land,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no.
1, pp. 1-17, 2021
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Hao
Li et al. “Evaluation Models for Soil Nutrient Based on Support Vector Machine
and Artificial Neural Networks,” The
Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Rajan
Prasad, and Praveen Kumar Shukla, “A Review on the Hybridization of Fuzzy
Systems and Machine Learning Techniques,” Computer
Vision and Robotics, pp. 403-420, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Sumbangan
Baja, David M Chapman, and Deirdre Dragovich, “Using GIS-based Continuous
Methods for Assessing Agricultural Land-Use Potential in Sloping Areas,” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics
and City Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3-20, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Sumbangan
Baja, David M. Chapman, And Deirdre Dragovich, “A Conceptual Model for Defining
and Assessing Land Management Units Using a Fuzzy Modeling Approach in GIS
Environment,” Environmental Management,
vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 647-661, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] P.A.
Burrough, “Fuzzy Mathematical Methods for Soil Survey and Land Evaluation,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 40,
no. 3, pp. 477-492, 1989.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] P.A.
Burrough, R.A. MacMillan, and W. van Deursen, “Fuzzy Classification Methods for
Determining Land Suitability from Soil Profile Observations and Topography,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol.
43, no. 2, pp. 193-210, 1992.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Florent Joerin, Marius Thériault, and Andre
Musy, “Using GIS and Out Ranking Multi-Criteria Analysis for Land-Use
Suitability Assessment,” International
Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 153-174,
2001.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] D.A. Kurtener, and V.L. Badenko,
“Precision Agriculture Experimentation on the Base of Fuzzy Models Synthesized
with GIS,” Aspects of App. Biology,
vol. 61, pp. 139-143, 2000.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Dmitry
Kurtener, and Vladimir Badenko, “Fuzzy Algorithms to Supportspatial Planning,” Planning Support Systems in Practice,
pp. 249-265, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] W.N. Xiang et al., “A Fuzzy Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model and Its Application to Land-Use Planning,” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 61-84, 1992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]