International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology
Volume 16 | Number 2 | Year 2014 | Article Id. IJMTT-V16P513 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V16P513
The success of business at the farm level mainly depends on the Technical efficiency (TE) of the farm. There are evidences that several farms do not realize the full potential of technology due to factors such as their managerial skills and differences in production environments. The present study was undertaken to quantify and measure technical efficiency score of 180 turmeric farms from north western region of Tamil Nadu using Translog Normal Half-Normal Stochastic Frontier Model (TNHNSFM), to know variations in efficiency among the farms and to analyse the policy implications for improving the efficiency. The maximum estimated technical efficiency was 99.14 per cent while the minimum was 87.02 per cent. The strength of relationship that exists between the observed efficiency and technical efficiency was given by the correlation coefficient 0.587 OE r and the Chi-square value was 1.4386.The significant level of the parameter 1.84 resulted in the presence of technical inefficiency. Moreover, a greater part of the residual variation in output was associated with the variation in technical inefficiency rather than with measurement error. The estimate of 0.77 indicated that the difference between the observed output and frontier output was primarily due to the factors which were 77 percent under the control of farms.
[1]. Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell and P.Schmidt (1977), Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production\ Function Models, Journal of Econometrics, 6: 21-37.
[2]. David Hadley (2006), Patterns in Technical Efficiency and Technical Change at the Farm-level in England and Wales, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 57, No. 1, 81–100
[3]. Farrell, M.J., (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal -Statistical Society, 120 (Series A, Part 3): 253-281.
[4]. Hossein Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Renato Villano, Euan Fleming (2008), Technical efficiency and environmental-technological gaps in wheat production in Kerman province of Iran Agricultural Economics 38: 67–76
[5]. Kalirajan, K.P., (1981), An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29: 283-294.
[6]. Kalirajan, K.P., and M.B. Obwona (1994), Frontier Production Function- The Stochastic Coefficients Approach, Oxford bulletin of economics and Statistics, 56: 85 - 94.
[7]. Lee, L.F. and W.G. Tyler, (1978), A stochastic frontier production function and average efficiency: An empirical analysis, Journal of Econometrics , 7: 385-390.
[8]. Mary Louis, L., and A. John Joel (2010), Data Envelopment Analysis-an application to turmeric production in North Western region of Tamil Nadu, OPSEARCH, 47(3):205-215
[9]. Mythili, G and K.R. Shanmugam, (2000), Technical Efficiency of Rice Growers in Tamil Nadu – A study Based on panel Data, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55 (1):16-17
[10]. Shanmugam, T.R. and K.Palanisami (1994), Measurement of Economic Efficiency – Frontier Function Approach, Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 45(2): 235-242.
[11]. Tadese, Bedassa and S. Krishnamoorthy (1997), Technical efficiency in paddy farms of Tamil Nadu: an analysis based on farm size and ecological zone, Agricultural Economics, 16: 185-192.
[12]. Young Hoon Lee (2006), Production, Manufacturing and Logistics-A Stochastic Frontier Model with group specific temporal variations in Technical Efficiency, European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 173(3): 1616-1630.
L. Mary Louis, "Translog Normal - Half Normal Stochastic Frontier Production function–An application to Turmeric Production," International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 79-86, 2014. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V16P513
PDF 
Abstract 
Keywords 
References 
Citation