Volume 1 | Issue 1 | Year 2011 | Article Id. IJMTT-V1I1P3 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V1I1P3
The best way of accommodating the intensively growing network traffic and satisfying the ever tighter demands on throughput, delay and overall network performance is by using optical fiber technology. Optical fiber is characterized by huge bandwidth of up to 50 THz, low BER of 10 12 low loss of down to 0.2 dB/km and low noise and interference characteristics. The best way of exploiting this immense potential is by dividing it among independent sets of different wavelengths, which is the underlying principle of Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM). Each wavelength supports one communication channel, operating independently at an arbitrary speed. Independently modulated wavelengths are all multiplexed and carried simultaneously over the same physical fiber. Transparent Optical Networks (TON) enable all-optical channels, called light paths, to be established between any pair of nodes
1. H. Zang, J. P. Jue and B. Mukherjee, “A
Review of Routing and Wavelength
Assignment Approaches for WavelengthRouted Optical WDM Networks,” Optical
Networks Magazine, vol. 1, pp. 47–60,
January 2000.
2. I. Chlamtac, A. Ganz and G. Karmi,
“Lightpath communications: an approach to
high-bandwidth optical WANs,” IEEE
Transactions on Communications, vol. 40,
pp. 1171–1182, 1992.
3. R. Ramaswami and K. N. Sivarajan,
“Optical Networks: A Practical
Perspective,” 2nd edition, R. Adams, Ed.,
San Diego: Academic Press, 2002, pp. 437–
488.
4. T. Song, H. Zhang, Y. Guo and X. Zheng,
“Statistical Study of Crosstalk Accumulation
in WDM Optical Network Using Different
RWA,” Optics Communication 202, pp.
131–138, 2002.
5. S. Azodomolky, M. Klinkowski, E.
Marin, D. Careglio, J. Sol´e Pareta and I.
Tomkos, “A survey on physical layer
impairments aware routing and wavelength
assignemnt algorithms in optical networks,”
Computer Networks: The International
Journal of Computer and
Telecommunications Networking, vol. 53,
no. 7, p. 926–944, May 2009.
6. C. C. Saradhi and S. Subramaniam,
“Physical Layer Impairment Aware Routing
(PLIAR) in WDM Optical Networks: Issues
and Challenges,” IEEE Communications
Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 109–
130, 4th quarter 2009.
7.M. M´edard, D. Marquis, R. A. Barry and
S. G. Finn, “Security Issuesin All-Optical Networks”, IEEE Network
Magazine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 42–48, May
1997.
8. T. Wu and A. K. Somani, “Cross-Talk
Attack Monitoring and Localization in AllOptical Networks,” IEEE/ACM
Transactions on Networking 13, pp. 1390-
1401 (2005).
9. M. M´edard, D. Marquis, S. R. Chinn,
“Attack Detection Methods for All-Optical
Networks”, in in Proc. of Network and
Distributed Systems Security Symposium,
Session 3, paper 2, San Diego, California,
1998.
10. J. K. Patel, S. U. Kim, D. H. Su, S.
Subramaniam and H.-A. Choi, “A
Framework for Managing Faults and
Attacks in WDM Optical Networks,” Proc.
of the DARPA Information Survivability
Conference and Exposition, Anaheim,
California 2001.
11. C. Mas, I. Tomkos and O. K. Tonguz,
“Failure Location Algorithm for Transparent
Optical Networks,”, IEEE Journal on
Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 23,
no. 8, pp. 1508–1519, August 2005.
12. T. Deng and S. Subramaniam, “Covert
low-power QoS attack in alloptical
wavelength routed network,” in Proc. of
IEEE Global Telecommunications
Conference (GLOBECOM)vol. 3, pp. 1948-
1952, 200
K. Kajendran, K.Balaji, N. Siva kumar, "ALL OPTICAL NETWORK-A NEW APPROACH FOR SECURITY," International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31-37, 2011. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V1I1P3