Volume 69 | Issue 4 | Year 2023 | Article Id. IJMTT-V69I4P503 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V69I4P503
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Feb 2023 | 01 Apr 2022 | 13 Apr 2023 | 28 Apr 2023 |
Xi Wang, "Study on the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Based on Multinomial Logistic Regression Model," International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 17-28, 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V69I4P503
[1] Gobor Kovacs et al., “Can you ever Collect too Many Oocytes?,” Human Reproduction, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 81-87, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[2] L. Zhuang, and C.F. Hao, “Effects of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid Autoantibodies on Pregnancy Outcome After in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 391-396, 2017.
[3] X.Y. Gao, and T. Li, “The Effect of Repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation on Ovarian Functional Status,” Journal of Sun Yat sen University, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 186-189, 2008.
[4] P. Blondin et al., “Superovulation can Reduce the Developmental Competence of Bovine Embryos,” Theriogenology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1191-1203, 1996.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[5] Sesh Kamal Sunkara et al., “Association between the Number of Oocytes and Live Birth in IVF Treatment: An Analysis of 400 135 Treatment Cycles,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1768-1774, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[6] Pia Saldeen, Karin Kallen, and Per Sundstrom, “The Probability of Successful IVF Outcome after Poor Ovarian Response,” Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 457-461, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[7] H.Q. Lu, Y.J. He, “The Impact of Female Age and Number of Oocytes Retrieved on Pregnancy outcomes During the Rectangular IVF/ICSI Cycle,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1017-1026, 2019.
[8] M.F.G.Verberg et al., “The Clinical Significance of the Retrieval of a Low Number of Oocytes following Mild Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: A Meta-Analysis,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5-12, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[9] Alba Cascales et al., “Effect of Ovarian Stimulation on Embryo Aneuploidy and Mosaicism Rate,” Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 42-49, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[10] Jia Huang et al., “Insufficient Histone-3 Lysine-9 Deacetylation in Human Oocytes Matured Invitro is Associated with Aberrant Meiosis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 178-184, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[11] Veronica N. Lobach et al., “Caspase-3 Gene Expression in Human Luteinized Granulosa Cells is Inversely Correlated with the Number of Oocytes Retrieved after Controlled Ovarian Stimulation,” Human Fertility, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 33-38, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[12] Adva Aizer et al., “Is There Any Association Between the Number of Oocytes Retrieved, Women Age, and Embryo Development?,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1890-1900, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[13] Farah Tamirou et al., “The Euro-Lupus Low-Dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide Regimen Does Not Impact the Ovarian Reserve, as Measured by Serum Levels of Anti–Müllerian HormonE,” Arthritis and Rheumatology, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1267-1271, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[14] H.Y. Xu, and Y. Feng et al., “Study on the Changes of Serum Anti Mullerian Hormone Levels During and Between Menstrual Cycles in Women of Childbearing Age,” J Pract Obstet Gynecol, vol. 33, no. 5.
[15] James O. Berger, Xiaojing Wang, and Lei Shen, “A Bayesian Approach to Subgroup Identification,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 110-129, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[16] L.L Van Loendersloot et al., “Predictive Factors in in vitro Fertilization (IVF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 577-589, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[17] Adva Aizer, and J. Haas, “Is There any Association Between the Number of Oocytes Retrieved, Women Age, and Embryo Development?,” Medicine(Baltimore), vol. 95, p. e4957, 2021.
[18] W.X. Zhu, “Advances in the Application of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction in Mammals,” Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 42-48, 2022.
[19] X.D. Wu, “Clinical Application of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate in the Auxiliary Diagnosis of PCOS,” Chinese Journal of Eugenics and Genetics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 164-168, 2023.
[20] X.H. Zhang, “Application and Clinical Value of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Detection,” Health for all, vol. 558, no. 4, pp. 105-107, 2023.
[21] J.S. Cramer, “The Origins of Logistic Regression,” Tinbergen Institute Working Paper, vol. 119, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[22] J.X. Xiao, L.Y. Cai, and J. Chen, “Study on the Correlation between Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Pregnancy Outcome of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation,” Maternal and Child Health Care of China, vol. 31, no. 19, pp. 4010-4013, 2016.
[23] L. B. Simone, “Added Value of Ovarian Reserve Testing on Patient Characteristics in the Prediction of Ovarian Response and Ongoing Pregnancy: An Individual Patient Data Approach,” Maternal and Child Health Care of China, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 26-36, 2013.
[24] Sara S.E. Alson et al., “Anti-müllerian Hormone Levels are Associated with Live Birth rates in ART, but The Predictive Ability of Antimüllerian Hormone is Modest,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 225, pp. 199-204, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]
[25] Reshef Tal et al., “Antimüllerian Hormone as a Predictor of Live birth following Assisted Reproduction: An Analysis of 85,062 Fresh and Thawed Cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 258-265, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher link]