Volume 35 | Number 2 | Year 2016 | Article Id. IJMTT-V35P519 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V35P519
Mohamed Sayed Ali Osman, Gamal Eldin Abd El_Hakim Mohamed, "Parametric Analysis on the MCDM using TOPSIS," International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 145-150, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V35P519
[1] Caterino N., Iervolino I., G. Manfredi & E. Cosenza" Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 24 pp 432– 445, (2009).
[2] Fei Ye, Yina Li, "An extended TOPSIS model based on the Possibility theory under fuzzy environment",(2014).
[3] Opricovic S., Tzeng Gwo-H. ," Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS",European Journal of Operational Research 156 , pp445–455, (2004).
[4] Thor J. , Siew-Hong Ding , Kamaruddin S. " Comparison of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods From The Maintenance Alternative Selection Perspective ", The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES) Volume 2 , Pages 27-34 (2013).
[5] Pangsri Prapawan ,"Application Of The Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods For Project Selection",(1): pp.15-20, (2015).
[6] Samant R., Deshpande S., Jadhao A.," Multi Criteria Recommendation System for Material Management", Volume – 5 Issue -03, pp. 16004- 16008,(2016).
[7] Jahanshahloo G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Izadikhah M." Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data", 181 pp1544–1551, (2006).
[8] Poyhonen M., Raimo P. Hamalainen,"On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods pp.569-585,(2001).
[9] Papadopoulos A. M. (Part I), Konidari P. (Part II)," Overview and selection of multi- criteria evaluation methods for mitigation/ adaptation policy nstruments", Greece, (2011).
[10] Ewa Roszkowska," Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods– A Comparative Overview", 5 (65) (2013).